Text-to-App

Dec 16, 2025

Culture, crawlers, and who gets credited

🧩 The Gist

A widely shared essay argues that what many call the “ChatGPT voice” borrows from real human styles, highlighting how cultural education and lived experience shape AI outputs. In parallel, a network post shows OpenAI’s OAI-SearchBot fetching a robots.txt on a freshly certified subdomain almost immediately, suggesting discovery via certificate transparency logs. Hacker News threads around both items debate authorship, attribution, and standard industry crawling practices. The pattern, voice and visibility, centers on who gets mirrored by AI and how the web gets mapped for it.

🚀 Key Highlights

  • A Substack piece titled “I’m Kenyan. I Don’t Write Like ChatGPT. ChatGPT Writes Like Me.” reframes AI style as derivative of human voices rather than the other way around.
  • The author recalls schoolroom conventions, like opening with proverbs and emphasizing ornate synonyms, to explain why certain cadences feel familiar in AI text.
  • The post raises representation questions about which communities’ language patterns appear in training data and how credit is recognized.
  • A network log shows OAI-SearchBot/1.3 requesting robots.txt for a new subdomain shortly after a TLS certificate was issued, implying discovery from certificate transparency logs.
  • A reply suggests such discovery is a practical way to seed a search index, connecting CT monitoring to indexing workflows.
  • Hacker News commenters note that many actors monitor CT logs, from major platforms to smaller operators, framing the practice as common.

🎯 Strategic Takeaways

  • Product and platform
    • Expect scrutiny of crawler behavior, clearly document user agent policies, respect robots.txt, and provide opt out controls.
    • CT log monitoring is treated as normal reconnaissance by many, so transparency about intent and scope can reduce confusion.
  • Data and ethics
    • The “AI voice” may echo specific communities’ education and style, so invest in dataset provenance, attribution, and stylistic diversity reviews.
    • Center cultural context when evaluating output quality, not just grammar or fluency.
  • Security and ops
    • New certificates can trigger near‑instant discovery, so monitor early post-issuance traffic and confirm that access controls and robots policies match your exposure goals.

🧠 Worth Reading

“I’m Kenyan. I Don’t Write Like ChatGPT. ChatGPT Writes Like Me.” This essay argues that AI text often reflects real, taught writing patterns, making AI less an originator and more a mirror. The practical takeaway for builders and editors, treat style critiques as questions about data lineage and attribution, and broaden who gets represented when curating or evaluating training corpora.